Legal and Regulatory Objectives for Carbon Capture

Key takeaways

The term CCUS, or carbon capture, utilization, and storage, is a crucial technique for reducing emissions that can be used across the energy system.
Pricing signals are produced when the supply and demand curves for a particular good or service alter due to these pressures.
They must be outfitted with enough funding, personnel, and knowledge to manage CCUS implementation regulations.

Delving Into Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) #

The term CCUS, or carbon capture, utilization, and storage, is a crucial technique for reducing emissions that can be used across the energy system. Carbon dioxide (CO2) from fuel combustion or industrial processes is captured via CCUS technology, transported by ship or pipeline, and then used as a resource to produce valuable goods or services or permanently stored underground in geological formations.

When the CO2 comes from bio-based processes or straight from the atmosphere, CCUS technologies also lay the groundwork for carbon removal or “negative emissions.”

Advantages of CCUS #

Generating More Power: Power production turbines may operate more effectively if CO2-based steam cycles, in which CO2 is pressured into a supercritical fluid, are used. These cycles could facilitate heat transfer and need less energy to compress steam. Additionally, it is possible to produce sustainable geothermal energy by using geologically stored CO2 to harvest geothermal heat from the same regions it introduces.
Increase the Fuel: Technically, CO2 can be changed into a fuel. There are other ways to do this, but they are challenging in terms of cost and effort.
Support Production Processes: We can use CO2 to generate chemicals and plastics, including polyurethanes, which make soft foams like those found in mattresses.
Increase Employment: More qualified technicians would be required to oversee CCS operations if more of them were implemented.
Enriched Concrete: Infrastructure durability is boosted by strengthening concrete with captured CO2.

Why Does CCUS Need Legal Frameworks? #

In order to manage risks at different points in the supply chain and support technological investment, the innovation of the carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) supply chain will necessitate the foundation of regulatory and legal power, both at the international and domestic levels. The regional and domestic regime has been recognized within this regulatory and legal framework as a critical element that may help or hinder the development of a larger-scale CCUS supply chain. As a result, governmental support for CCUS has been given in several nations and regions that serve as both carbon dioxide sources and sinks.

The kind of role that CCS laws and regulations play in stakeholder engagement will, to a large extent, depend on the jurisdiction in question and be influenced by the following factors: stakeholder consultation procedures connected to planning and environmental impact assessments; stakeholder participation cultures; general legal environments; and, of course, the content of pertinent legal provisions. However, international case studies illustrate how legislation may affect engagement.

Regulatory Procedures of CCUS #

The International Energy Agency (IEA) views carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a critical component of international efforts to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and thereby control global warming. According to the IEA, the widespread adoption of low-carbon energy technologies can cut emissions to a level consistent with a two degree celsius rise in the global temperature; in this case, CCS would account for around one-fifth of the reductions in emissions. However, to achieve that target, over 100 CCS projects must be implemented by 2020 and over 3,000 by 2050.

Policies that boost demand and cut prices will be necessary to advance CCS, as stated in the Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Policies like carbon pricing, public investment and subsidies, and clean energy standards that reward businesses producing electricity or other energy sources using CCS can lower the cost of CCS and promote research, innovation, and deployment.

The IEA created the IEA International CCS Regulatory Network (Network) in 2008 as a venue for knowledge exchange among regulators and policy-makers to ensure that regulatory frameworks, or an absence thereof, do not unduly inhibit ecologically sound demonstration and deployment of CCS.

Some of the steps to regulate CCS include: #

Determining the motivation for the creation of the CCS framework
Gaining knowledge of how current regulatory frameworks address CCS-related issues
Deciding whether to alter existing regulations or create new, specific legislation
Potentially analyzing suggested regulatory strategies

The Current Status of CCUS Worldwide #

Forty million metric tonnes of CO2 can currently be captured annually by plants that are operating or being built, according to the Global CCS Institute’s 2021 Status Report. CCS stands for Carbon Capture and Storage. (To put this in perspective, the US or the United States released more than 5 billion metric tonnes of CO2 in 2019). Thirty-one commercial CCS facilities are active or under construction across the world. According to the map below, there are ten commercially active facilities in the United States alone.

102 CCS facilities were either fully developed or planned in 2021. When combined with existing or existing facilities, these facilities may absorb 149.3 million metric tonnes of CO2 annually. There are 135 CCUS projects planned for the world as of September 2021, 27 of which are already up and running, according to the Global CCS Institute (GCCSI). In the first nine months of 2021, 71 new projects were introduced. In each location, there have been 36 initiatives started, including 8 in the US, 5 in the UK, 4 in the Netherlands, and 36 in Belgium.

Business Dynamics #

The prices and actions of the Global Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Market stakeholders are influenced by market dynamics. Pricing signals are produced when the supply and demand curves for a particular good or service alter due to these pressures. Both macroeconomic and microeconomic issues may be related to forces of market dynamics. Other than pricing, demand, and supply, there are different dynamic market dynamics. Emotional reactions can also affect the market, how people make decisions, and signal price changes. Decision-makers try to determine the best approach to use different financial tools to stem various methods for accelerating growth and lowering risks when market dynamics affect supply and demand curves.

Different Countries With Their Contrasting Visions of CCUS #

A few nations currently have elaborate legal and regulatory structures for CCUS. These provide an invaluable knowledge base for the growing number of countries that have acknowledged the importance of CCUS in achieving their climate goals but have not yet created a legal framework for it, specifically for CO2 storage. In addition, as more commercial CCUS initiatives are established, current frameworks are also being tested more frequently, providing regulators with valuable lessons.

The inherent interest indicator (CCS-CI) calculates a country’s relative economic dependency on fossil fuels using a variety of statistics on demand and output for fossil fuels. The highest reliance on fossil fuels and the highest CCS-CI ratings are shared by nations that produce and use the most fossil fuels, including Australia, Canada, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Russia, and the United States. For these countries to safeguard their economies from any potential adverse effects of pursuing significant emission reductions, CCS is essential.

Mexico, Brazil, the Republic of Korea, and Poland are among the countries that perform well in the CCS-CI. To resolve the conflict between emission reduction and their current reliance on fossil fuels, CCS is crucial for these countries. The nations with strong CCS-CI scores but low CCS-RI scores are mainly concerned. These countries, whose economies are strongly dependent on fossil fuels and include India, Indonesia, Russia, and Thailand, have made very few preparations for implementing CCS. As a result, they are most in danger of experiencing severe economic harm as the need to decrease emissions develops.

Only five nations—Australia, Canada, Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States—are ranked in the highest index category. These five countries have developed supportive policy frameworks, comprehensive legal and regulatory frameworks, detailed and targeted storage assessments, and other actions to lower domestic barriers to CCS. China, Denmark, Germany, Japan, and the Netherlands are among the other countries that performed well in the Index and have made significant progress toward CCS preparedness.

Future Expectations Concerning Legal & Regulatory Policies for CCUS #

Technologies for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) are expected to be crucial in moving the world’s energy system toward net zero emissions. The Global Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Market is anticipated to reach USD 9.43 Billion by 2027, thus rising at a compound annual growth rate or CAGR of 27.14 percent from its estimated value of USD 2.84 Billion in 2022. The creation of legal and regulatory frameworks is necessary for the proper management of CCUS operations, the safe and secure storage of CO2 as well as the successful deployment of CCUS.

The objective is to support the involvement of national governments and international corporations with the knowledge and resources to help CCS technology. Governments should ensure the relevant agencies have the funding necessary to fulfil their regulatory obligations. They must be outfitted with enough funding, personnel, and knowledge to manage CCUS implementation regulations.

Related reading